CSI1000, Inc. v. Bishop Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
21
ORDER granting 20 Motion for Expedited Discovery. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/20/2013. (tmg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CSI1000, INC. d/b/a ARCHIVE1024,
Plaintiff,
v.
BISHOP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
ARCHIVE360, INC., ROBERT (“Bob”)
DeSTENO, MARGARET DeSTENO,
NICHOLAS (“Nick”) CZECZULIN,
TIBERIU (“Tibi”) POPP, ADELINA POPP,
FIVE TIMES, LLC, RBD CONSULTING, LLC,
and DALE MCVEEN,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:13-cv-638
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendants Bishop Technologies, Inc., Archive360,
Inc., and Dale McVeen’s Joint Consent Motion for Expedited Discovery (Doc. No. 20). The
Court being fully advised of Plaintiff’s consent and for good cause shown, finding it warranted
and necessary in light of the circumstances, hereby ORDERS as follows:
Defendants’ Motion for Expedited Discovery in advance of the January 31, 2014
hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED
as follows:
a.
Plaintiff is required to respond to Defendants’ interrogatories and document
requests within 15 days of the date of this Order, unless both parties consent to a later date;
b.
The parties are to conduct depositions of Plaintiff no later than January 10,
2014, unless both parties consent to a later date;
c.
Defendants are authorized to serve subpoenas to other persons with whom
Plaintiff has had communications relevant to the allegations in the Complaint and the
Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: December 20, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?