CSI1000, Inc. v. Bishop Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 21

ORDER granting 20 Motion for Expedited Discovery. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/20/2013. (tmg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CSI1000, INC. d/b/a ARCHIVE1024, Plaintiff, v. BISHOP TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ARCHIVE360, INC., ROBERT (“Bob”) DeSTENO, MARGARET DeSTENO, NICHOLAS (“Nick”) CZECZULIN, TIBERIU (“Tibi”) POPP, ADELINA POPP, FIVE TIMES, LLC, RBD CONSULTING, LLC, and DALE MCVEEN, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:13-cv-638 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants Bishop Technologies, Inc., Archive360, Inc., and Dale McVeen’s Joint Consent Motion for Expedited Discovery (Doc. No. 20). The Court being fully advised of Plaintiff’s consent and for good cause shown, finding it warranted and necessary in light of the circumstances, hereby ORDERS as follows: Defendants’ Motion for Expedited Discovery in advance of the January 31, 2014 hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED as follows: a. Plaintiff is required to respond to Defendants’ interrogatories and document requests within 15 days of the date of this Order, unless both parties consent to a later date; b. The parties are to conduct depositions of Plaintiff no later than January 10, 2014, unless both parties consent to a later date; c. Defendants are authorized to serve subpoenas to other persons with whom Plaintiff has had communications relevant to the allegations in the Complaint and the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. SO ORDERED. Signed: December 20, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?