Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC v. Foodman Hunter & Karres PLLC et al

Filing 54

ORDER denying 43 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 02/18/2015. (jlk)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-697-DCK
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
FOODMAN, HUNTER & KARRES, PLLC,
and JAMES W SURANE,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Defendants Motion To Compel
Discovery Responses From Plaintiff” (Document No. 43) filed January 15, 2015. The parties
have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and immediate
review is appropriate.

Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable

authority, the undersigned will deny the motion.
In response, Plaintiff contends it has fully responded to the requested discovery.
(Document No. 48). Defendant has failed to file a reply, or notice of intent not to reply, pursuant
to Local Rule 7.1(E). Under the circumstances, it appears that Defendants have abandoned their
motion to compel.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that “Defendants Motion To Compel Discovery
Responses From Plaintiff” (Document No. 43) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: February 18, 2015