Celgard, LLC v. LG Chem, Ltd. et al

Filing 208

ORDER denying 169 Motion To Increase Amount of Defendants' Bond Pending Their Appeal of Stayed Preliminary Injunction re 160 Order on Motion to Stay, Order on Motion for Leave to File, 164 Notice (Other). Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 8/29/2014. (eef)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 3:14-cv-00043-MOC-DCK CELGARD, LLC, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Vs. LG CHEM AMERICA, INC. LG CHEM, LTD., Defendants. ORDER THIS MATTER is before the court on plaintiff’s Motion to Increase Amount of Defendants’ Bond Pending Their Appeal of Stayed Preliminary Injunction. The court has carefully considered the arguments of the parties and determines that the $1,000,000.00 bond previously imposed is sufficient to secure plaintiff’s rights on the matter appealed during the pendency of the appeal, thus providing adequate protection. Fed.R.Civ.P. 62(c). In addition, the court has no reason to find that plaintiff’s potential harm during the appeal would exceed such amount, which is precisely the same bond the court required plaintiff to post when it secured injunctive relief. Further, the court has no reason to believe that if plaintiffs were to ultimately prevail in this matter that defendants would be unable or unwilling to pay even a substantial final judgment as there is no contention that such defendants are distressed or illiquid. Finally, plaintiff failed to follow this court’s instruction as to the manner in which to seek an increase in the bond. Order (#160) at 1. Having considered plaintiff’s motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. 1 ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion to Increase Amount of Defendants’ Bond Pending Their Appeal of Stayed Preliminary Injunction (#169) is DENIED. Signed: August 29, 2014 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?