Barranco et al v. 3D Systems Corporation et al

Filing 74

ORDER each party may submit a brief citing cases relevant to issue of remedies available for a violation of the functus officio doctrine by 7/11/16. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 6/29/16. (ssh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:14-cv-00188-RJC-DSC
RONALD BARRANCO and PRINT3D
CORPORATION,

)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
3D SYSTEMS CORPORATION, 3D
)
SYSTEMS, INC. DAMON GREGOIRE, )
JOHN DOES 1–10, JANE DOES 1–10,
)
and DOE ENTITIES 1–10,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________ )

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte following the motions hearing held
on June 29, 2016. At the hearing, the Court instructed the parties to submit case citations only
regarding the issue of remedies available to the Court should it find that the Modified Arbitration
Award violated the functus officio doctrine. Upon further review, the Court has determined,
however, that it may be beneficial to allow each party to provide a short narrative describing why
the cases it cites are relevant to the matter at hand. Accordingly, the Court will permit each side
to submit a brief addressing the cases on point for this issue. While the Court is expanding the
parties’ opportunity to describe the relevance of any case cited, it encourages the parties that
brevity is critical to persuasion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that each party may submit a brief citing cases relevant
to the issue of remedies available for a violation of the functus officio doctrine. Such briefs shall
be due by July 11, 2016.
Signed: June 29, 2016