Huntley v. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC

Filing 28

ORDER granting 22 Motion in the alternative (Motion to Compel). Plaintiff is Compelled to respond to Defendants First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents and to execute an Authorization for the Release of protected health information within fourteen (14) calendar days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 7/13/2015. (eef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-00224-RJC-DSC BOBBY C. HUNTLEY, Plaintiff, v. DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on “Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute and, in the Alternative, Motion to Compel” (document # 22) filed June 10, 2015 and the parties associated briefs and exhibits. See documents #22 and #27. The Court has carefully examined the record, the parties’ arguments and the applicable authorities. The Court will grant the Motion in the alternative and compel Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents and to execute an Authorization for the Release of protected health information within fourteen (14) calendar days of this Order. The Court also finds that Plaintiff should pay reasonable costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by Defendant in filing the instant Motion to Compel. Defendant shall submit an affidavit detailing the expenses, including attorneys’ fees incurred in the filing of the instant Motion within seven (7) calendar days of this Order. Upon reviewing the affidavit, the Court will enter an order granting reasonable costs. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel for the parties, including but not limited to moving counsel; and to the Honorable Robert J. Conrad, Jr.. SO ORDERED. Signed: July 13, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?