Knox v. Bissell Companies, Inc.
Filing
14
ORDERED, Plaintiff shall file her first amended complaint within thirty (30) days of this Order, FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint 7 , is administratively DENIED as moot without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 12/08/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jlk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-00424-MOC-DSC
DEBORAH KNOX,
Plaintiff,
v.
BISSELL COMPANIES, INC. AKA
BALLANTYNE HOTEL AND LODGE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s “Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
Complaint,” Doc. 7, and Plaintiff’s pro se filing, Doc. 12, and the parties’ associated briefs and
exhibits, Docs. 8 and 13.
This matter was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1) and the Motion is ripe for determination.
Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs amendments to pleadings. Rule
15(a)(1) grants a party the right to “amend its pleading once as a matter of course,” if done
within twenty-one (21) days after serving the pleading, Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(A), or, “if the
pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required,” a party may amend once as a matter
of course, provided that it does so within “21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21
days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier.” Fed. R. Civ. P.
15(a)(1)(B) (emphasis added). Rule 15(a)(2) further provides that leave to amend shall be freely
given “when justice so requires.” Id.
The Court has reviewed the pleadings and taken into consideration Plaintiff’s pro se
status, as well as the relatively early stage in this litigation. For those reasons, the Court will
construe Plaintiff’s filing, Doc. 12, as a Motion to amend her Complaint and will grant her leave
to amend pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff shall file her first
amended complaint within thirty (30) days of this Order.
The Court reminds Plaintiff of her obligation under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) to file an
amended complaint which contains a “short and plain statement” of her claims, as well as her
obligation under Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 8(d) to provide a “simple, concise, and direct” pleading.
The purpose of the complaint is to “give the defendant fair notice of what the ... claim is and the
grounds upon which it rests.” Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93 (2007) (per curiam) (quoting
Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)). “At its core, [Rule 8's] requirement is
the most natural embodiment of the ‘notice pleading’ standard established by the Rules.” Knox
v. Davis, No. 5:11–CT–3266–F, 2012 WL 2116501, at * 2 (E.D.N.C. June 11, 2012) (citing
Francis v. Giacomelli, 588 F.3d 186, 193 (4th Cir.2009)). “Rule 8 is not merely a toothless
preference, guideline, or ideal; it establishes a fundamental requirement and is regularly enforced
by the court.” Id. Its violation is grounds for dismissal of a complaint. See, e.g., Sewarz v. Long,
407 F. App'x 718, 718–19 (4th Cir.2011) (unpublished); North Carolina v. McGuirt, 114 F.
App'x 555, 558 (4th Cir.2004) (unpublished).
The Court warns Plaintiff that her failure to comply with the Court’s Orders, including
the Standing Order and Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan, the Local Rules and the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may result in DISMISSAL OF HER CLAIMS WITH
PREJUDICE.
It is well settled that an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, and that
motions directed at superseded pleadings are to be denied as moot. Young v. City of Mount
Ranier, 238 F. 3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001) (amended pleading renders original pleading of no
effect); Turner v. Kight, 192 F. Supp. 2d 391, 397 (D. Md. 2002) (denying as moot motion to
dismiss original complaint on grounds that amended complaint superseded original complaint).
Consequently, the Court orders that “Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint,”
Doc. 7, be administratively DENIED as moot without prejudice.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff shall file her first amended complaint within thirty (30) days of this
Order.
2.
“Defendant’s
Motion
to
Dismiss
Plaintiff’s
Complaint,”
Doc.
7,
is
administratively DENIED as moot without prejudice.
3.
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel for the parties,
including but not limited to moving counsel; and to the Honorable Max O.
Cogburn, Jr.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: December 8, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?