Bell v. Parker et al

Filing 65

ORDER granting 59 Motion for Default Judgment Mei-Ping Liang. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns on 1/6/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-444 KENNETH D. BELL, in his capacity as courtappointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com, Plaintiff, vs. CATHERINE PARKER, XIAOMEI WANG, BEVERLY DAWN TRCA-KITCHEN, BIN XU, JOEL BROUGHTON, FENG GUANG WU, DON FITZ-RITSON, RUTH KONIG, GUAN JUN ZHANG, LEON KILLAM, GUO HUA LIANG, SANDRA GAVEL, YONG SHENG WANG, DEVEY DEJONG, The Executor or Administrator of THE ESTATE OF BRUCE RICHARD FOELLER, BRIAN FUSSEY, SHAO ZHANG HUANG, JAMES MACELWAIN, EUGENE VEINOTTE, 0937702 B.C. LTD, MICHAEL GALLUP, JIA YU WANG, YING LIU, JANE FERGUSON, ZAHID ALI, and MEI-PING LIANG, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT THIS MATTER comes before the Clerk of Court on the Receiver’s Motion for Default Judgment by Clerk of Court (Doc. No. 59). The Clerk of Court previously entered default against Defendant Mei-Ping Liang on December 19, 2014 (Doc. No. 52). In accordance with Rule 55(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Plaintiff in this matter has requested a sum certain and has provided an affidavit showing the amount due by Defendant Mei-Ping Liang. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Receiver’s Motion for Default Judgment by Clerk of Court is GRANTED, and the Receiver shall have and recover of Defendant Mei-Ping Liang the sum of $60,662.87, which is comprised of $50,863.61 in principal and $9,799.26 in prejudgment interest from August 6, 2012 to January 2, 2015. Postjudgment interest shall accrue on the entire Judgment, including the award of prejudgment interest, at the rate specified under 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the date of entry of this Judgment until paid in full. Signed: January 6, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?