Bell v. Parker et al
Filing
65
ORDER granting 59 Motion for Default Judgment Mei-Ping Liang. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns on 1/6/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-444
KENNETH D. BELL, in his capacity as courtappointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC
d/b/a ZeekRewards.com,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CATHERINE PARKER, XIAOMEI WANG,
BEVERLY DAWN TRCA-KITCHEN,
BIN XU, JOEL BROUGHTON,
FENG GUANG WU, DON FITZ-RITSON,
RUTH KONIG, GUAN JUN ZHANG,
LEON KILLAM, GUO HUA LIANG, SANDRA
GAVEL, YONG SHENG WANG, DEVEY
DEJONG, The Executor or Administrator of
THE ESTATE OF BRUCE RICHARD
FOELLER, BRIAN FUSSEY, SHAO ZHANG
HUANG, JAMES MACELWAIN, EUGENE
VEINOTTE, 0937702 B.C. LTD, MICHAEL
GALLUP, JIA YU WANG, YING LIU,
JANE FERGUSON, ZAHID ALI, and
MEI-PING LIANG,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
JUDGMENT
THIS MATTER comes before the Clerk of Court on the Receiver’s Motion for Default
Judgment by Clerk of Court (Doc. No. 59). The Clerk of Court previously entered default
against Defendant Mei-Ping Liang on December 19, 2014 (Doc. No. 52). In accordance with
Rule 55(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Plaintiff in this matter has requested a
sum certain and has provided an affidavit showing the amount due by Defendant Mei-Ping
Liang.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Receiver’s Motion for Default Judgment by
Clerk of Court is GRANTED, and the Receiver shall have and recover of Defendant Mei-Ping
Liang the sum of $60,662.87, which is comprised of $50,863.61 in principal and $9,799.26 in
prejudgment interest from August 6, 2012 to January 2, 2015. Postjudgment interest shall accrue
on the entire Judgment, including the award of prejudgment interest, at the rate specified under
28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the date of entry of this Judgment until paid in full.
Signed: January 6, 2015
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?