Green v. Colvin

Filing 18

ORDER granting 16 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 11/16/15. (tob)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-cv-582-RJC-DSC BRENDA K. GREEN, PLAINTIFF, VS. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), filed on November 16, 2015. Having reviewed the Motion, supporting materials, memorandum in support, and the case file, the Court determines that Plaintiff is entitled to attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $5,800.00. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), is GRANTED to the extent that the Court will award attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,800.00, and that pursuant to Comm’r of Soc. Sec. v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. ----, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), the fee award will be subject to offset of any debt Plaintiff may owe to the United States. The Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the United States. If so, the debt will be satisfied first and if any funds remain they will be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel. If the United States Department of the Treasury reports to the Commissioner that Plaintiff does not owe any federal debt, the Government will exercise its discretion to honor an assignment of EAJA fees and pay them directly to Plaintiff’s counsel. No additional petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) shall be filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall receive $419.44 in costs from the Judgment Fund of the United States Department of the Treasury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)(91). SO ORDERED. Signed: November 16, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?