Jafrum International, Inc. v. Crorama, Inc. et al

Filing 24

ORDER denying as moot 17 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 19 Amended Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Claim Nos. 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 are Dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 1/5/16. (tob)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-00636-MOC-DSC
JAFRUM INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
HUSNAIN ALAMDAR, et. al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ “Motion to Dismiss” (document #17)
and “Amended Motion to Dismiss” (document #19), as well as the parties’ briefs and exhibits.
The Court has carefully reviewed the parties’ arguments, the record and authorities. For the
reasons stated in Defendants’ briefs, their Amended Motion to Dismiss is granted.
Plaintiff’s Response (document #21) includes the term “hit and run tactics” as well a
sarcastic and gratuitous comment in footnote 1. Counsel is admonished to refrain from including
such language in future filings with the Court.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendants’ “Motion to Dismiss” (document #17) is DENIED AS MOOT.
2. Defendants’ “Amended Motion to Dismiss” (document #19) is GRANTED and Claim
Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20 are DISMISSED for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction.
3. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel for the parties.
SO ORDERED.

Signed: January 5, 2016