Oxendine-Bey v. Mitchell et al

Filing 49

ORDER denying 48 Motion requesting that defendants turn over relevant documents. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 1/13/16. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:14-cv-651-FDW
CHRISTOPHER OXENDINE-BEY,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
JOHN MITCHELL, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________ )

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Motion Requesting that Defendants
Turn Over Relevant Documents that Is Key Evidence Inside of this Case,” (Doc. No. 48).
Plaintiff’s motion will be denied. Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2 and the Court’s scheduling
order entered on October 14, 2015, all discovery requests in this matter are to be served on the
parties, and discovery requests are not to be filed with the Court. Although Plaintiff is entitled to
obtain discovery from Defendants, he must serve his discovery requests on Defendants directly,
rather than through a motion filed with the Court.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
(1)

Plaintiff’s “Motion Requesting that Defendants Turn Over Relevant Documents
that Is Key Evidence Inside of this Case,” (Doc. No. 48), is DENIED.

P;lo

1