Hoffman v. Family Dollars Stores, Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER re 1 Notice of Removal, 15 Amended Complaint, 8 Addendum, in light of Plaintiffs pro se status, the Court will read each of those documents 1 8 15 as a whole, and construe those documents collectively as the Complaint in this matter. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 01/30/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jlk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 3:14-cv-00664-FDW-DCK ARTHEA HOFFMAN, Plaintiff, vs. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE THIS MATTER is before the Court after Plaintiff’s filing of a Pro Se Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 15) on January 21, 2015. Plaintiff has filed three separate variations of a complaint – an initial complaint (Doc. No. 1); an “Addendum”, which the Court construed as a Motion to Amend the Complaint (Docs. Nos. 8, 13), and an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 15). In light of Plaintiff’s pro se status, the Court will read each of those documents (Doc. No. 1, 8, and 15) as a whole, and construe those documents collectively as the Complaint in this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: January 30, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?