Bell v. Bjerring et al

Filing 76

ORDER granting 58 Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant Anni Thompson. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns on 9/3/2015. (tmg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION KENNETH D. BELL, in his capacity as courtappointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC d/b/a, Plaintiff, vs. GERT BJERRING, DAVID MITCHELL, NICOLA HOLLOWAY, SAM FAWAHL, WARREN HICKEY, HEALTH AND SUCCESS PTY. LTD., LARS FREDERIKSEN, PAUL MANDELT, KELVIAN HANSEN, ANNI THOMPSON, ANN AUDREY HICKEY, R&J THUMM FAMILY P/L as Trustee for THUMM INVESTMENT TRUST, DAVID CANE, KARANDA HOLDINGS PTY. LTD., DONNA WALTON, MICHAEL GEORGHIOU, THOMAS VON EITZEN, BRADLEY FERRIES, ROBIN REID, LINDA WELCH, MAUREEN FISHER, BARRY GOODSELL, DAVID JOSEPH, and BIRTHE SEATON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-724 JUDGMENT THIS MATTER comes before the Clerk of Court on the Receiver’s Motion for Default Judgment by Clerk of Court. See Doc. No. 58. The Clerk of Court previously entered default against Defendant Anni Thompson on July 21, 2015. See Doc. No. 36. In accordance with Rule 55(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Plaintiff in this matter has requested a sum certain and has provided an affidavit showing the amount due by Defendant Thompson. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Receiver’s Motion for Default Judgment by Clerk of Court is GRANTED, and the Receiver shall have and recover of Defendant Thompson the sum of $120,843.41, which is comprised of $95,566.00 in principal and $25,277.41 in prejudgment interest from August 13, 2012 to August 31, 2015. Postjudgment interest shall accrue on the entire Judgment, including the award of prejudgment interest, at the rate specified under 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the date of entry of this Judgment until paid in full. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?