United States v. Regge

Filing 3

ORDER granting 1 Application Pursuant to 28 USC 1782. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/7/15. (tob)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:14-MC-245-MOC-DCK IN RE: Request for International Judicial Assistance from the National First Instance Court on Civil Matters No. 58, Buenos Aires, Republic of Argentina In Re: Regge, Ida Margarita, Succession Proceedings, File No. 3977/20133 ______________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Petitioner United States of America’s “Application For Order Pursuant To Title 28, United States Code, Section 1782” (Document No. 1) filed December 31, 2014. This application has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. The Court has read and considered the request for assistance (Exhibit A, Document No. 2-1) from the National First Instance Court on Civil Matters No. 58, Buenos Aires, Republic of Argentina, seeking evidence for use in a judicial proceeding in that country, and it appears that the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1782 have been satisfied. Having carefully considered the entire application, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will grant the request for assistance. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED pursuant to the authority conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 1782 and this Court's inherent authority, that Assistant United States Attorney Paul B. Taylor (or a substitute or successor subsequently designated by the Office of the United States Attorney), is hereby appointed as Commissioner of this Court and directed to take such steps as are necessary to collect the evidence requested. In doing so, the following rules shall govern: 1 1. the Commissioner may issue subpoenas to be served on persons (natural and artificial) within the jurisdiction of this Court ordering them or their representatives to appear and to testify and produce evidence located within the United States; 2. the Commissioner shall provide notice with respect to the collection of evidence to those persons identified in the request as parties to whom notice should be given (and no notice to any other person shall be required); 3. the Commissioner shall adopt procedures to collect the evidence requested consistent with its use as evidence in a proceeding before a tribunal in the requesting forum, which procedures may be specified in the request or provided by the requesting court or authority or by a representative of the requesting country; 4. the Commissioner, in collecting the evidence requested, may be accompanied by persons whose presence or participation is authorized by the Commissioner, including, without limitation, representatives of the requesting forum who, as authorized or directed by the Commissioner, may direct questions to any witness; 5. any person from whom the Commissioner seeks to collect evidence may oppose the giving of evidence, or the circumstances thereof, by motion timely filed with this Court, a copy of which shall be provided contemporaneously to the Commissioner; 6. the Commissioner may seek such further orders of this Court as may be necessary to execute this request, including: a. orders to show cause why persons served with commissioner’s subpoenas who fail to produce evidence should not be held in contempt, and b. protective orders to regulate the use of the evidence collected; 2 7. the Commissioner shall certify and submit the evidence collected to the Office of Foreign Litigation, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, or as otherwise directed by that office for transmission to the requesting court or authority; and 8. the Commissioner may provide copies of the evidence collected to persons identified in the request as parties to whom such copies should be given (and to no other persons). SO ORDERED. Signed: January 7, 2015 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?