Dyer v. City of Gastonia

Filing 74

ORDER denying re 73 Letter. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 10/13/2016. (chh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 3:15-cv-00033-MOC-DCK
SUSAN DYER,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF GASTONIA,
Defendant.

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the court on plaintiff’s pro se letter to the court. In her letter,
plaintiff states that “I thought I would have my attorney’s fees paid, but…my attorney kept all of
the money…I left court with a mere $22,000.” Plaintiff also claims that her computer was
tampered with and surveillance was set up to watch her. She claims that the City of Gastonia
uploaded documents to her computer.
Plaintiff is advised that defendant has satisfied the Judgment and that the court’s Order
awarding an attorney’s fee is final and has also been satisfied. See Notice (#72). If plaintiff
believes that her attorney improperly retained the attorney’s fee award, such is not a matter for
this court but a concern she can raise with the North Carolina State Bar through its fee dispute
resolution program. Finally, plaintiff’s complaints about defendant allegedly tampering with her
computer are beyond this court’s jurisdiction. If plaintiff believes that a person has tampered
with her computer, such complaints should be brought to the attention of local authorities or she
should consult with an attorney as to what action she may take.

-1-

ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that to the extent plaintiff seeks relief from this court
in her pro se letter (#73), such relief is denied.

Signed: October 13, 2016

-2-