Bell v. Pleym et al

Filing 23

ORDER granting 22 Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants Anne-Mett Helland and Vita-min AS. JUDGMENT is entered against Defendants in the amount of $68,722.24. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 4/1/2016. (tmg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) KENNETH D. BELL, in his capacity as court- ) appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, ) LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) GEIR VIDAR PLEYM, ROGER GULDAHL, ) ANNE LIV DALE, FREDRIK SKJOLDT, ) ROBERT ULVBERGET, STIAN ) ALEXANDER KARLSEN, PIA FORE, ) KNUT FORE, FREDRIK HARALD ) SKJOLDT, MORTEN SKAAR, CMS ) HUSET AS, ODD STEINAR NORDLIEN, ) ANNE-METT HELLAND, and VITA-MIN ) AS, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-81 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Receiver’s Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants Anne-Mett Helland and Vita-min AS (collectively “Defendants”). The Court finds that default was properly entered against Defendants by the Clerk of this Court under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) after Defendants failed to plead or otherwise defend. Further, the Court finds that the letter from Defendant Helland subsequently sent to Receiver’s counsel does not constitute a proper answer or Rule 12 motion under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2), the Court will grant the Motion and enter Judgment against Defendants for the full amount of Defendants’ net winnings plus interest. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Receiver’s Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants Anne-Mett Helland and Vita-min AS is hereby GRANTED and JUDGMENT is entered against Defendants in the amount of $68,722.24. SO ORDERED. Signed: April 1, 2016 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?