Ashby et al v. City of Charlotte et al

Filing 31

ORDER denying as moot re 13 MOTION to enjoin defendant from ever disrupting the speech and ministery efforts of Shon Asby, 5 MOTION for Permanent Injunction . Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/1/15. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:15-CV-103 SHON ASHBY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Vs. ) ) CITY OF CHARLOTTE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) ORDER This matter is before the Court upon Defendant Calvary Church’s Motion to Enjoin Plaintiff Ashby from Filing Future Pro Se Lawsuits against Calvary Church (Doc. No. 5) and Plaintiff Ashby’s pro se “Motion to Enjoin Defendant from Ever Disrupting the Speech and Ministry Efforts of Shon Ashby” (Doc. No. 13). Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit alleging that Defendants violated their rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. All Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Court granted Defendant Calvary Church’s motion on July 23, 2015, and granted the motion of the remaining Defendants on August 6, 2015. A Clerk’s Judgment was entered and this case was closed on August 27. The Court finds that both motions to enjoin are therefore moot. However, the Court does note that even if the Defendant’s Motion to Enjoin was not moot, a prefiling injunction requires a far more extensive record of abusive filing than this case presents. IT IS THEREFEORE ORDERED that Defendant Calvary Church’s Motion to Enjoin Plaintiff Ashby from Filing Future Pro Se Lawsuits against Calvary Church (Doc. No. 5) and Plaintiff Ashby’s pro se “Motion to Enjoin Defendant from Ever Disrupting the Speech and Ministry Efforts of Shon Ashby” (Doc. No. 13) are both DENIED as moot. Signed: September 1, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?