Sinclair v. Knowledge Universe Education LLC
Filing
9
ORDER granting 3 Motion to Strike ; granting 5 Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby Dismissed. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 6/2/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(chh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:15CV165
GERMAINE SINCLAIR,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
Vs.
)
)
KNOWLEDGE UNIVERSE
)
EDUCATION LLC,
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________________)
ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
Complaint (Doc. No. 5) and Defendant’s Motion to Strike, or in the Alternative, Motion for
Order of Redaction (Doc. No. 3). On May 7, 2015, the Court entered a Roseboro Order directing
the pro se Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss by May 26, 2015. Plaintiff has
failed to file a response with the Court.
For the reasons stated in Defendant’s brief in support of its Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff’s
Complaint is dismissed pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6), 8, and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. Moreover, the Court hereby strikes pages 10 and 27-28 of Document 1-2 (Exhibits
A, J, and K to Plaintiff’s Complaint) as those pages contain the names of minor children, in
violation of Rule 5.2(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
Complaint (Doc. No. 5) is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby DISMISSED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Strike is hereby GRANTED.
Signed: June 2, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?