PGI Polymer, Inc. v. Greenbrier International, Inc. et al
Filing
26
ORDER denying as moot 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 07/20/2015. (jlk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 3:15-cv-00216-FDW-DSC
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PGI POLYMER, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
GREENBRIER INTERNATIONAL, INC., and
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.,
Defendants.
CONSENT ORDER AS TO STIPULATED INJUNCTION
WHEREAS Plaintiff PGI Polymer, Inc. (hereafter “PGI Polymer”) has filed this action
against Defendants Greenbrier International, Inc. (“Greenbrier”) and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
(“Dollar Tree”) (together “Defendants”), for trademark infringement and unfair competition
under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114 and 1125, for violation of the North Carolina Unfair
& Deceptive Trade Practices Act, N.C.G.S. § 75-1.1, and for unfair competition and trademark
infringement under applicable state law, and
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction dated
May 8, 2015 (“Motion”) with supporting documents submitted therewith, and Defendants having
received service of said documents,
WHEREAS, Defendants have filed an Answer and Counterclaims specifically denying
the claims and liability and seeking to cancel the asserted trademark and opposed the Motion;
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Dismiss the Defendants’ Counterclaims and
has specifically denied those Counterclaims in its Answer;
WHEREAS Defendants have consented to take certain actions as set forth herein;
Accordingly, Plaintiff and Defendants (hereafter “the Parties”) stipulate to the relief as set forth
herein:
1.
Defendants have agreed to voluntarily suspend sales of the product
Plaintiff claims is an infringement of its trademark rights and agreed to maintain that
suspension during this proceeding.
2.
Defendants, their respective officers, agents, servants, employees and
attorneys, are ENJOINED from:
a. directly or indirectly, manufacturing, producing, distributing, circulating,
selling, offering to sell, promoting, or advertising any product that uses or is
confusingly similar to Plaintiff’s registered trademark, U.S. Reg. No.
1,175,550, for non-woven fabrics consisting of a design made up of wavy
lines continuously extending across the entire surface of the goods, the lines
being of a color which is readily discernible against the background upon
which the trademark appears (hereafter the “Wavy Lines Mark”), except for
any products manufactured by Plaintiff or its authorized agents or licensees;
b. representing itself, in any way, as authorized, by license, sponsorship, or
otherwise, to use the Wavy Lines Mark, unless and until such time as that
authority or license is granted;
2
3.
Defendants shall cease all advertising, marketing, offering for sale, sales,
and distribution of the Scrub Buddies® non-woven fabrics that use the Wavy Lines
Mark, as defined and described in the above-referenced Complaint (hereafter, the “Scrub
Buddies® Fabrics”) and any other products bearing the Wavy Lines Mark by July 30,
2015.
4.
This Order and injunction shall remain in force and effective until the
earlier of: a final disposition of this action; a dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims, by Plaintiff
or this Court; or a subsequent order of this Court.
5.
This Order shall not alter the obligations of the Parties to preserve
information under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This includes the obligation to
refrain from destroying documents sufficient to show total inventory, purchase, and sales
of goods bearing the Wavy Lines Mark.
6.
Defendants waive the posting of security in connection with this
injunction.
7.
Therefore, for these reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary
Injunction (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED AS MOOT.
AS STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: July 20, 2015
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?