Steele v. Robinson et al
Filing
44
ORDER re 42 USMS Return of Service. The U.S. Marshal is directed to file with the Courts docket its proof of service personally on Defendant Robinson before this Court may address Plaintiffs pending motion for default judg ment against Defendant Robinson. The Marshal may file the proof of service under seal or redacted if necessary to ensure confidentiality of Defendant Robinsons home address.Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 7/5/178. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:15-cv-252-FDW
BRANDON GERALD STEELE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
FNU ROBINSON, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on a periodic status review. On May 12, 2017, this
Court entered an order directing the U.S. Marshal to use reasonable efforts to locate and personally
serve Defendant Renesha Robinson with the Clerk’s Entry of Default against her, as well as the
pending Motion for Default Judgment. (Doc. No. 39). On June 15, 2017, the U.S. Marshal filed
a “Return of Service,” which states that Robinson was “personally served” on June 14, 2017. (Doc.
No. 42 at 1). The U.S. Marshal did not attach any documentation showing that personal service
was made on Robinson in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Furthermore, the return of service shows only the former work address for Defendant Robinson.
The U.S. Marshal is directed to file with the Court’s docket its proof of service personally on
Defendant Robinson before this Court may address Plaintiff’s pending motion for default
judgment against Defendant Robinson. The Marshal may file the proof of service under seal or
redacted if necessary to ensure confidentiality of Defendant Robinson’s home address.
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: July 5, 2017
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?