Reid v. Colvin

Filing 23

CONSENT ORDER granting 20 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 6/16/16. (tob)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:15-cv-00322-FDW-DSC WILLIE LEE REID, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER Pursuant to the power of this Court to award attorney fees to a prevailing party other than the United States incurred by that party in a civil action against the United States, including proceedings for judicial review of agency action under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (“EAJA”), and in light of this Court’s judgment and Order dated March 16, 2016 remanding this case to the Agency for further proceedings, and further that Plaintiff, in the fee agreement submitted by Plaintiff with Plaintiff’s Motion for EAJA fees, has assigned any attorney fees owed under the EAJA to her attorney and authorized Plaintiff’s attorney to endorse any government check for attorney fees paid to Plaintiff under the EAJA, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the United States Social Security Administration agrees to pay attorney fees in the amount of $4,000.00 in full satisfaction of any and all attorney fees claims Plaintiff may have in this case under the EAJA. SO ORDERED. Signed: June 16, 2016 CONSENTED TO: /s/ WHITNEY T. SCARBOROUGH Attorney at Law State Bar Number 43186 Poisson, Poisson & Bower, PLLC 300 East Wade Street Wadesboro, North Carolina 28170 Telephone: (704) 694-5515 Fax: (704) 694-3616 wts@poissonlaw.com /s/MARY ELLEN RUSSELL Attorney for Defendant Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel Room 611, Altmeyer Building 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21235 Telephone: (410) 966-6388 Fax: (410) 597-0137 Mary.Ellen.Russell@ssa.gov

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?