Doctor v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
Filing
21
ORDER Plaintiff shall have fourteen days from service of this Order in which to either return the filled-out summons forms to the Clerk for service of process on Defendants Defendants Marshall, Parker, Melin, Hoyle, and Harris, or to respond to this Order showing cause for why he has not returned the summons forms to the Clerk for service of process.. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/23/17. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:15-cv-452-FDW
OBADIAH DOCTOR,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
)
PUBLIC SAFETY, ET AL.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on a periodic status review of Plaintiff’s action filed
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, on August 29, 2015. On September 29, 2017, this Court entered an
Order directing service of process on Defendants Marshall, Parker, Melin, Hoyle, and Harris to
Plaintiff at his address of record with instructions for Plaintiff to fill out and return them for service
of process by the U.S. Marshals Service. (Doc. No. 20). To date, Plaintiff has not returned the
summons forms to the Clerk for service of process by the U.S. Marshal.
1
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
(1)
Plaintiff shall have fourteen days from service of this Order in which to either
return the filled-out summons forms to the Clerk for service of process on
Defendants Defendants Marshall, Parker, Melin, Hoyle, and Harris, or to respond
to this Order showing cause for why he has not returned the summons forms to the
Clerk for service of process. If Plaintiff fails to respond to this Order, this action
will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff.
Signed: October 23, 2017
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?