Southpark Morrison, LLC v. Ferncroft Morrison LLC et al
Filing
32
ORDER re 31 Stipulation Regarding Damages.. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 9/21/16. Judgment is entered in favor of Ferncroft Morrison LLc; Carolina Property Acquisitions, LLC; and Southern Property Acquisitions, LLC and against Southpark Morrison, LLC in the amount of $73,807.29 plus $207.91 per diem from 9/13/16 until date of final judgment. Issue of an award of attorney fees is held in abeyance pending appeal.(ssh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:15-cv-00489-RJC-DCK
SOUTHPARK MORRISON, LLC
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
FERNCROFT MORRISON LLC; CAROLINA )
PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS, LLC; and
)
SOUTHERN PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS,
)
LLC,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the parties’ Consent Stipulation Regarding
Damages, (Doc. No. 31).
The Court previously denied Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, granted
Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in part, and ordered additional briefing on the
issue of monetary damages. (Doc. No. 27: Order). In the instant pleading, the parties stipulate to
the calculation of monetary damages according to the Court’s previous ruling, which Plaintiff
intends to appeal. (Doc. No. 31 at 2-3). The parties also request the Court hold the issue of
attorneys’ fees in abeyance pending that appeal. (Id. at 3).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that, in accordance with the parties’ Consent
Stipulation Regarding Damages, (Doc. No. 31):
1. Judgment is entered in favor of Ferncroft Morrison LLC; Carolina Property
Acquisitions, LLC; and Southern Property Acquisitions, LLC and against
Southpark Morrison, LLC in the amount of $73,807.29, plus $207.91 per diem
from September 13, 2016, until the date of final judgment; and
1
2. The issue of an award of attorneys’ fees is held in abeyance pending appeal.
Signed: September 21, 2016
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?