Legacy Data Access, LLC v. MediQuant, Inc.

Filing 63

ORDER denying 34 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying as moot 53 Motion for Sanctions; denying as moot 56 Motion to Strike ; denying 31 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 12/6/16. (clc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 3:15-cv-00584-FDW-DSC LEGACY DATA ACCESS, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. MEDIQUANT, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 31), Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 34), Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 53), and Defendant’s Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 56). The Court held a hearing on these motions on December 6, 2016 (“the hearing”). For the reasons stated in the Court’s oral ruling in open Court following the hearing, Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 31) and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 34) are DENIED. In addition, for the reasons stated in the Court’s oral ruling in open Court following the hearing, the Court continues trial in this case from the January trial term to the March trial term to allow additional discovery as limited by the Court’s oral ruling. The Case Management Order (Doc. No. 17) is hereby amended to reflect the new deadlines set by the Court in its oral ruling. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 53) and Defendant’s Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 56) are DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: December 6, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?