Walker et al v. SGB Corporation et al

Filing 24

ORDER sua sponte re 20 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint . ( Responses due by 2/25/2016). Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 2/16/16. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-607-RJC-DCK
ELIJAH WALKER and CRYSTAL
WALKER,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SGB CORPORATION d/b/a WEST
AMERICA MORTGAGE COMPANY;
GOVERNMENT NATIONAL
MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a/k/a
GINNIE MAE REMIC TRUST 2005-028;
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEM, a/k/a
MERS; CITIMORTGAGE, INC.;
RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT
SERVICES, LLC; and DOES 1
THROUGH 100,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the filing of
Defendants Citimortgage, Inc. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.’s “Motion To
Dismiss Amended Complaint” (Document No. 20).
In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison 582 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises
Plaintiffs, who are proceeding pro se, that they have a right to respond to Defendants motion. The
Court also advises Plaintiffs that failure to respond may result in Defendants being granted the
relief they seek, that is, the dismissal of the Complaint.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiffs may respond to the pending “Motion
To Dismiss Amended Complaint” (Document No. 20) on or before February 25, 2016. Failure
to file a timely and persuasive response will likely lead to the dismissal of this lawsuit.

SO ORDERED.
Signed: February 16, 2016