InVue Security Products Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc.
Filing
62
ORDER granting the court's own Motion, and the previously-scheduled Markman hearing is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending one or more of the petitions pending before the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The parties shall continu e to file regular status reports. It is further Ordered that the parties shall file within 30 days of this Order, written arguments as to (a) whether Case No. 3:17cv270 should be consolidated with the instant case and (b) whether the court should retain jurisdiction over the instant matter or transfer the case to another jurisdiction.. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 6/20/2017. (chh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 3:15-cv-00610-MOC-DSC
INVUE SECURITY PRODUCTS INC.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
MOBILE TECH, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the court on the court’s own Motion. Having considered the
motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.
The court entered a prior scheduling Order (#50) for a Markman hearing to be held on
June 26, 2017. Subsequently, the court entered an Order (#59) that stayed the case pending
determinations of the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board of one or more of the petitions pending
there.
The court is also aware of another pending action between the same parties regarding
patent infringement claims, Case No. 3:17-cv-270, filed on May 23rd, 2017. The court instructs
the parties to provide written arguments as to whether the similar pending case should be
consolidated into the instant lead case. These written filings shall also include arguments as to
whether the stay should be lifted for the limited purpose of determining proper jurisdiction of
this matter. Specifically, the parties should address whether the District of Oregon is a more
appropriate forum for this matter in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in T.C.
-1-
Heartland LLC v. Kraft Food Group Brands LLC, —U.S.—, (2017). Counsel are also
encouraged to discuss amicable consolidation and transfer.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the court’s own Motion is GRANTED, and the
previously-scheduled Markman hearing is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending one or more of the
petitions pending before the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The parties shall continue to
file regular status reports and keep the court abreast of developments of the pending matters
before that Board.
FURTHER, IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file, within thirty (30) days of this
Order, written arguments as to (a) whether Case No. 3:17-cv-270 should be consolidated with the
instant case and (b) whether the court should retain jurisdiction over the instant matter or transfer
the case to another jurisdiction.
Signed: June 20, 2017
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?