Sharp v. Miller et al

Filing 4

ORDER that Plaintiff must identify each of the plaintiffs that may be parties to this case and if there are additional plaintiffs, each plaintiff must sign the complaint and submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis if they cannot pay the $400 filing fee. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 10/5/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (tmg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:15-cv-00325-RJC-DCK ANTHONY A. SHARP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. M. MILLER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on an initial review of Plaintiff’s pro se complaint and his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). In the complaint, Plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the defendants were negligent in treating and caring for his mother and that this contributed to her untimely death in March 2013. Plaintiff appears to note that there are multiple plaintiffs in his complaint but he only filed one motion to proceed in forma pauperis, which was completed by him, and he does not identify the addresses of any of the other plaintiffs although the complaint is signed by Plaintiff and Talisha Rogers whom he identifies as his sister. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff must identify each of the plaintiffs that may be parties to this case and if there are additional plaintiffs, each plaintiff must sign the complaint and submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis if they cannot pay the $400 filing fee. SO ORDERED. Signed: October 5, 2015 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?