Pagani v. Modus eDiscovery et al
Filing
16
ORDER setting Status Conference 6/1/2016 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom, 401 W Trade St Charlotte, NC 28202 before Senior Judge Graham Mullen.. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 4/27/16. (ssh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-00024-GCM
THOMAS PAGANI,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ABTIN BUERGARI
MODUS EDISCOVERY,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on its own Motion. Plaintiff filed his Amended
Complaint on February 1, 2016. (Doc. No. 8) On February 18, Defendants’ filed their Answer.
(Doc. No. 9) After the attorneys filed their Certification of Initial Attorney Conference and
Discovery Plan (Doc. No. 10), this matter was set for a pretrial conference. Before the conference
was conducted, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 11) and
Memorandum in Support (Doc. No. 12). This Court requested that Plaintiff informally notify the
Court of any discovery needed to respond to Defendant’s Motion and ordered that discovery be
stayed in the interim. (Doc. No. 13) The Court has considered Plaintiff’s requests, submitted by
letter copying Defense Counsel, as well as Defendants’ opposition, and has determined that a status
conference is necessary to resolve this discovery dispute. Plaintiff is not required to respond to
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment prior to the conference.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that both parties appear in court for a status conference
on June 1, 2016 at 10:30 am. Counsel should be prepared to discuss Defendant’s Motion and the
discovery issues mentioned in their letters to the Court.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: April 27, 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?