Sentry Casualty Company v. Canal Insurance Company et al
Filing
46
ORDER granting 39 Continental Casualty Company's Motion to Intervene. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 6/29/16. (mga)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-025-RJC-DCK
SENTRY CASUALTY COMPANY,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY;
)
INTERSTATE RESOURCES, INC.;
)
INTERSTATE PAPER, LLC; MICHAEL
)
JOSEPH WINGATE; DENISE VENATOR,
)
as surviving spouse of RICKY LEE
)
VENATOR, and as the Administratrix of the )
Estate of RICKY LEE VENATOR,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________ )
)
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY,
)
)
Intervenor-Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
)
)
Intervenor-Defendant.
)
_______________________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Continental Casualty Company’s
Motion To Intervene” (Document No. 39) filed June 7, 2016. This motion has been referred to the
undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is
appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will grant
the motion. The undersigned notes that no opposition, or any other response has been filed, and
the time to do so has lapsed. See Local Rule 7.1(E).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that “Continental Casualty Company’s Motion To
Intervene” (Document No. 39) is GRANTED. 1
SO ORDERED.
Signed: June 29, 2016
1
The Administrative Procedures Governing Filing and Service by Electronic Means, revised
January 1, 2012, at Part II, Section A, Paragraph 8, provide that: “If filing a document requires leave of
the Court, such as an amended complaint, the attorney shall attach the proposed document as an exhibit to
the motion according to the procedures in IV. If the Court grants the motion, the filer will be responsible
for electronically filing the document on the case docket.”
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?