Sentry Casualty Company v. Canal Insurance Company et al

Filing 46

ORDER granting 39 Continental Casualty Company's Motion to Intervene. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 6/29/16. (mga)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-025-RJC-DCK SENTRY CASUALTY COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY; ) INTERSTATE RESOURCES, INC.; ) INTERSTATE PAPER, LLC; MICHAEL ) JOSEPH WINGATE; DENISE VENATOR, ) as surviving spouse of RICKY LEE ) VENATOR, and as the Administratrix of the ) Estate of RICKY LEE VENATOR, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________ ) ) CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, ) ) Intervenor-Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Intervenor-Defendant. ) _______________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Continental Casualty Company’s Motion To Intervene” (Document No. 39) filed June 7, 2016. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will grant the motion. The undersigned notes that no opposition, or any other response has been filed, and the time to do so has lapsed. See Local Rule 7.1(E). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that “Continental Casualty Company’s Motion To Intervene” (Document No. 39) is GRANTED. 1 SO ORDERED. Signed: June 29, 2016 1 The Administrative Procedures Governing Filing and Service by Electronic Means, revised January 1, 2012, at Part II, Section A, Paragraph 8, provide that: “If filing a document requires leave of the Court, such as an amended complaint, the attorney shall attach the proposed document as an exhibit to the motion according to the procedures in IV. If the Court grants the motion, the filer will be responsible for electronically filing the document on the case docket.” 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?