Boyd v. Colvin

Filing 20

ORDER denying 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 17 Motion for Summary Judgment; affirming 19 Memorandum and Recommendations, and the Commissioners determination be VACATED and this matter be REMANDED for further consideration as directed herein. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 3/21/2017. (eef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:16-CV-069-GCM-DCK JEANETTE S. BOYD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the memorandum and recommendation of United States Magistrate David C. Keesler, filed February 21, 2017. The parties were advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), written objections to the memorandum and recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service of the memorandum. It appears to the court that the parties have not filed any such objections. After an independent and thorough review of the magistrate's memorandum, the court concludes that there is no clear error on the face of the record and that the recommendation to deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, deny the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, vacate the Commissioner’s determination, and remand for further consideration is correct and in accordance with law. Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate are accepted, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. The Commissioner’s determination is vacated and this matter is hereby REMANDED for further consideration. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the memorandum and recommendation of the magistrate is hereby AFFIRMED. Signed: March 21, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?