Boyd v. Colvin
Filing
24
ORDER granting 22 Consent Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 6/19/17. (mga)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-069-GCM-DCK
JEANETTE S. BOYD,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL ,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiff’s “Consent Motion For Fees
Pursuant To The Equal Access To Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A)” (Document No. 22)
filed June 19, 2017. Having carefully reviewed the motion and the record, and noting consent of
Defendant’s counsel, the undersigned will grant the motion, and Plaintiff should be awarded an
attorney’s fee under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount
of $5,200.00.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Consent Motion For Fees Pursuant
To The Equal Access To Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A)” (Document No. 22) is
GRANTED, to the extent that the Court will award attorney fees in the amount of $5,200.00, and
that pursuant to Comm’r of Soc. Sec. v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the fee award will first be
subject to offset of any debt Plaintiff may owe to the United States. The Commissioner will
determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the United States. If so, the debt will be satisfied first,
and if any funds remain, they will be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel. If
the United States Department of the Treasury reports to the Commissioner that the Plaintiff does
not owe a federal debt, the government will exercise its discretion and honor an assignment of
EAJA fees, and pay the awarded fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel. No additional petition
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) shall be filed.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: June 19, 2017
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?