Alshuli v. Colvin
Filing
14
ORDER granting 13 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 10/10/16. (tob)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
No. 3:16-cv-125-DSC
ABDULSALAM AL-SHULI,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
THIS ACTION being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by
the parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent
Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant
United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of
Social Security should pay the sum of $4,300.00 for attorney fees, and that the Treasury Judgment
Fund (“TJF”) should pay $400.00 in costs, in full and final settlement of all claims arising under
the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the
sum of $4,300.00 and that the TJF pay the sum of $400.00, sent to Plaintiff’s Counsel’s office
address, in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and
upon the payment of such sums this case is dismissed with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: October 10, 2016
CONSENTED TO:
/s/ CHARLOTTE W. HALL
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar # 41290
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 791-1886
charlotte@charleshallfirm.com
/s/ MARC EPSTEIN
Attorney for Defendant
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
6401 Security Boulevard
Altmeyer Building, Room 642
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Telephone: 410-965-8122
Facsimile: 410-597-0527
Marc.epstein@ssa.gov
New York Bar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?