Alshuli v. Colvin

Filing 14

ORDER granting 13 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 10/10/16. (tob)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION No. 3:16-cv-125-DSC ABDULSALAM AL-SHULI, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER THIS ACTION being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $4,300.00 for attorney fees, and that the Treasury Judgment Fund (“TJF”) should pay $400.00 in costs, in full and final settlement of all claims arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the sum of $4,300.00 and that the TJF pay the sum of $400.00, sent to Plaintiff’s Counsel’s office address, in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sums this case is dismissed with prejudice. SO ORDERED. Signed: October 10, 2016 CONSENTED TO: /s/ CHARLOTTE W. HALL Attorney for Plaintiff N.C. Bar # 41290 Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C. P.O. Box 10629 Raleigh, NC 27605 Telephone: (919) 791-1883 Fax: (919) 791-1886 /s/ MARC EPSTEIN Attorney for Defendant Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel 6401 Security Boulevard Altmeyer Building, Room 642 Baltimore, MD 21235-6401 Telephone: 410-965-8122 Facsimile: 410-597-0527 New York Bar

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?