Sealy et al v. Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al

Filing 19

ORDER that parties shall file a Notice on or before 1/6/2017 identifying mediator and mediation date & provide explanation & show cause why sanctions should not issue for not following the Court's 11/28/16 Order.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 01/03/2017. (ttl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-143-MOC-DCK MICHAEL L. SEALY and SHELLY N. SEALY, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) FAY SERVICING, LLC; OCWEN MORTGAGE ) SERVICING, INC.; and CHRISTIANA TRUST, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the status of the case and the parties’ compliance with the Court’s most recent “Order” (Document No. 18). This case has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. On November 28, 2016, the undersigned ordered that “the parties shall file a Notice identifying their chosen mediator and mediation date, on or before December 15, 2016.” (Document No. 18, p.5). In addition, that Order “respectfully advised” Plaintiffs “that failure to abide by this Order or the Rules of this Court, and/or Plaintiffs’ continued dilatory conduct, may lead to additional sanctions including dismissal of this lawsuit.” (Document No. 18, p.4). To date, neither party has filed a Notice as ordered by the Court, and the time to do so has lapsed. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the parties shall file a Notice, jointly if possible, on or before January 6, 2017 that identifies their chosen mediator and mediation date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ Notice(s) shall provide an explanation for why the Court’s previous Order was not followed, and SHOW CAUSE why sanctions should not issue against both parties and/or their counsel. SO ORDERED. Signed: January 3, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?