Allen v. Perri et al

Filing 4

ORDER sua sponte re 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Response due on or before May 23, 2016. Failure to file a timely and persuasive response will likely lead to the dismissal of this lawsuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 5/5/16. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-177-RJC-DCK
BETTY P. ALLEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. A. PERRI, DR. SUSAN DENISE
STURGESS, PIEDMONT EMERGENCY
MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, PA, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the filing of
Defendant’s “Motion To Dismiss Rule 12(B)(6)” (Document No. 3).
In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison 582 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that she has a right to respond to Defendant’s motion. The
Court also advises Plaintiff that failure to respond may result in Defendant being granted the relief
he seeks, that is, the dismissal of the Complaint.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff may respond to the pending “Motion To
Dismiss Rule 12(b)(6)” (Document No. 3) on or before May 23, 2016. Failure to file a timely and
persuasive response will likely lead to the dismissal of this lawsuit.

Signed: May 5, 2016