United States of America et al v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority

Filing 35

ORDER granting 34 Motion Limited Supplemental Briefing On Impact Of The Second Circuit's Opinion In United States V. Am Express Co. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 1. Defendant shall submit a supplemental memorandum of no more than 10 pages on or before October 12, 2016; 2. Plaintiffs shall submit a supplemental memorandum of no more than 10 pages on or before October 25, 2016; and 3. If Plaintiffs address matters outside the scope of the decision in United Sta tes v. American Express or raise arguments that do not fairly meet the arguments made in the Defendant's supplemental memorandum, Defendant may seek leave of Court to file a supplemental memorandum of no more than 5 pages. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 9/29/16. (mga)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-311-RJC-DCK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Plaintiffs, v. THE CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, d/b/a CAROLINAS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Defendant’s Consent Motion For Limited Supplemental Briefing On Impact Of The Second Circuit’s Opinion In United States v. Am. Express Co.” (Document No. 34) filed September 29, 2016. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting Plaintiffs’ consent to the motion, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that “Defendant’s Consent Motion For Limited Supplemental Briefing On Impact Of The Second Circuit’s Opinion In United States v. Am. Express Co. (Document No. 34) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 1. Defendant shall submit a supplemental memorandum of no more than 10 pages on or before October 12, 2016; 2. Plaintiffs shall submit a supplemental memorandum of no more than 10 pages on or before October 25, 2016; and 3. If Plaintiffs address matters outside the scope of the decision in United States v. American Express or raise arguments that do not fairly meet the arguments made in the Defendant’s supplemental memorandum, Defendant may seek leave of Court to file a supplemental reply memorandum of no more than 5 pages. SO ORDERED. Signed: September 29, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?