Davis v. USA

Filing 10

ORDER granting 9 Motion to Stay. This case is held in abeyance pending the Fourth Circuits consideration of Taylor, No. 19-7616. The Government shall have 60 days following the Fourth Circuits issuance of its mandate in Taylor file an answer, motion, or other response to the § 2255 Motion to Vacate.Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 4/27/2020. (ams)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:16-cv-384-MOC (3:11-cr-80-MOC-DSC-1) ZAVIER MARQUIS DAVIS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) ___________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on its own motion and a Motion to Stay, (Doc. No. 9), filed by counsel for Petitioner. The Court ordered the parties to file a Response indicating why this matter should not proceed based on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Davis, No. 18431. Counsel for Petitioner has filed this Motion to Stay pending the Fourth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Taylor, No. 19-7616 in which a certificate of appealability was granted, in part, on the issue of whether attempted Hobbs Act robbery categorically qualifies as a predicate crime of violence for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Counsel for the Government consents to this Motion. (Doc. No. 9 at 2). The Court finds that the Motion to Stay is in the interests of justice and judicial economy and will be granted. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s Motion to Stay, (Doc. No. 9), is GRANTED. 2. This case is held in abeyance pending the Fourth Circuit’s consideration of Taylor, No. 19-7616. The Government shall have 60 days following the Fourth Circuit’s 1 Case 3:16-cv-00384-MOC Document 10 Filed 04/27/20 Page 1 of 2 issuance of its mandate in Taylor file an answer, motion, or other response to the § 2255 Motion to Vacate. Signed: April 27, 2020 2 Case 3:16-cv-00384-MOC Document 10 Filed 04/27/20 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?