Carawan v. Mitchell et al

Filing 31

ORDER Denying 30 Motion For More Interrogatories to Be Asked by Plaintiff. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/3/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(jaw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:16-cv-563-FDW
WILLIAM CARAWAN, JR.,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
FNU MITCHELL, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Motion for More Interrogatories to Be
Asked by Plaintiff,” (Doc. No. 30). In his motion, Plaintiff seeks to submit twenty additional
interrogatories in order to obtain answers to what Plaintiff asserts were “vague responses” by
Defendants to Plaintiff’s original twenty interrogatories, as allowed by this Court’s scheduling
order.
Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. If Plaintiff believes that Defendants have not
satisfactorily responded to his original interrogatories allowed in this Court’s scheduling order he
may file a motion to compel discovery after conferring in good faith with Defendants, and before
the deadline for discovery ends.
Signed: October 3, 2017

1