Bobbitt v. Scott et al

Filing 43

ORDER that Plaintiff is instructed to direct his discovery request to the appropriate party or parties in accordance with the applicable procedural rules and Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan re 41 Pro Se Plaintiff's Request for Admissions, 40 Pro Se Plaintiff's Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 09/25/2018. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:16-cv-576-FDW

WILLIE T. BOBBITT,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
FNU SCOTT, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions, (Doc.
No. 40), and Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents, (Doc. No. 41).
Plaintiff’s requests for discovery have been misdirected to the Court. See Local Rule 26.2
(“The parties shall not file any initial disclosures, designations of expert witnesses and their
reports, discovery requests or responses therto, deposition transcripts, or other discovery material
unless: (1) directed to do so by the Court; (2) such materials are necessary for use in an in-court
proceeding; or (3) such materials are filed in support of, or in opposition to, a motion or petition.”).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is instructed to direct his discovery
requests to the appropriate party or parties in accordance with the applicable procedural rules and
Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan.

Signed: September 25, 2018

1