Mills v. Colvin

Filing 20

ORDER denying without prejudice 19 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 8/2/17. (mga)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-598-DCK MARILYNNE MILLS, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiff’s “Motion For Attorney’s Fees Pursuant To The Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412” (Document No. 19) filed August 2, 2017. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will deny the motion, without prejudice to re-file. Plaintiff has failed to show that the requirement of consultation has been met pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(B). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion For Attorney’s Fees Pursuant To The Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412” (Document No. 19) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed: August 2, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?