United States of America v. Approximately $7,000 in funds et al

Filing 12

ORDER granting 11 Motion for Discovery. The parties may conduct pre-trial discovery up to April 6, 2017. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a Status Report upon completion of their initial discovery, but no later than April 12, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/5/17. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-647-FDW-DCK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. APPROXIMATELY $7,000 IN FUNDS SEIZED DURING A SEARCH OF JOHN SHEHU AT THE CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT; APPROXIMATELY $44,250.00 IN FUNDS SEIZED DURING A SEARCH OF SAMUEL FLOOD AT THE CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT; and APPROXIMATELY $21,000 IN FUNDS SEIZED DURING A SEARCH OF JOAN MANUEL CALDERON AT THE CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Government’s Motion To Conduct Discovery” (Document No. 11) filed December 16, 2016. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will grant the motion. The undersigned notes that no response has been filed to this motion, and the time to do so has lapsed. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the “Government’s Motion To Conduct Discovery” (Document No. 11) is GRANTED. The parties may conduct pre-trial discovery up to April 6, 2017. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a Status Report upon completion of their initial discovery, but no later than April 12, 2017. SO ORDERED. Signed: January 5, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?