Miller v. Union County Public Schools et al

Filing 35

PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/10/17. (mga)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:16-CV-666-FDW-DCK TARYN MILLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNION COUNTY BOARD ) OF EDUCATION and JANICE BURNS, ) in her official and individual capacity, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________ PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiff and Defendants, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(b) and 26(c), anticipating in this case the disclosure to each other of personnel records and information, student records and information, and medical and/or financial information in initial disclosures and in response to discovery requests, and recognizing that the private and confidential nature of such documents and information must be safeguarded pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. §§115C-319, 115C-320, 115C-321, 115C-325, 115C-402 and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. § 1232(g), consent to disclose said documents and information upon the conditions set forth in this Protective Order, which conditions are consented to by the parties. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. That all documents and information relating to current or former students, including Plaintiff, enrolled in the Union County Public Schools which are provided to any party in the above-captioned case shall be covered by the terms of this Order. The Parties in possession of such records shall comply with FERPA, which requires reasonable efforts to provide notice so that parents or eligible students may seek protective action prior to such production. 2. That all records which are maintained by law or policy in the personnel files of specific current and former employees of the Union County Board of Education which are provided to any party in the above-captioned case shall be covered by the terms of this Order. 3. That all documents and information relating to Plaintiff’s medical and/or financial records which are provided to any party in the above-captioned case shall be covered by the terms of this Order. 4. That any party which provides documents subject to this Order shall label said documents: “Confidential – Subject to Protective Order.” Each party retains the right to challenge the confidential designation of any particular document and to have the Court determine its proper designation. Notwithstanding the “confidential” designation, a party may redact certain sensitive information within a particular document, such as social security numbers, dates of birth, financial account information, etc. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2. However, a party may not redact any information regarding the name or identity of a potential witness, even if such witness is a minor, or other legitimately discoverable information. The Protective Order's sealing provisions shall be deemed sufficient to protect any such confidential information. 5. Parties seeking to file or maintain under seal any documents labeled “Confidential” in accordance with the provisions of this Protective Order shall comply with the provisions of LCvR 6.1 and the Administrative Procedures Governing Filing and Service by Electronic Means. 6. Except as may be otherwise provided by further order of the Court, protected information and documents designated as confidential (“confidential documents”), as well as the matters contained therein and extracts and summaries thereof, shall be used for no other purpose 2 than prosecuting or defending this action and shall be disclosed only to the persons identified in paragraph 7. 7. Except as provided in paragraph 8, access to or use of protected information or any confidential documents, or any part thereof, as well as matters contained therein, shall be limited to: a. The Court; b. The parties and their officers, employees, and agents who are providing assistance to counsel in this action; c. The attorneys of record for the parties, their associates, assistants, employees, and agents who are providing assistance to counsel in this action; d. Mediators; e. Consultants and experts involved in the preparation of the trial of this f. Court reporters, their transcribers, assistants, and employees; g. Any deponent or trial witness to the extent that it is necessary to tender to action; such witness a confidential document in order to elicit testimony relevant to the matters at issue in this case; and h. Members of the jury to the extent that it is necessary for the jury to inspect a confidential document. 8. No one subject to this Order shall make public or disclose protected information or confidential documents to anyone other than the persons listed in paragraph 7, provided that nothing herein shall preclude a witness, attorney, or the Court from reading aloud or discussing the contents of a confidential document in open court or at depositions. The terms of this Order 3 shall apply to all persons listed in paragraph 7, and counsel who grant any such person access to protected information or confidential documents shall have an affirmative duty to furnish the person with a copy of this Order. Individuals permitted access to protected information or confidential documents are hereby ordered not to convey or otherwise reveal said information or documents--whether originals or copies, in whole or in part--to anyone who would not otherwise have access to them under this Order. 9. It is specifically agreed that making confidential materials or documents available for inspection, and the production of confidential information, materials or documents shall not constitute a waiver by the parties of any claim of confidentiality, and the production of such information, materials or documents shall not be considered as an acknowledgment that the information, materials or documents may be admissible into evidence at the trial of this action. 10. Nothing in this Protective Order shall require disclosure of material which the conveying party contends is protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, materials produced in anticipation of litigation, or as constituting attorney work product materials. 11. This Protective Order shall not prevent any party from applying to the Court for relief therefrom, or from applying to the Court for further or additional protective orders, or from agreeing among themselves to modification of this Protective Order, subject to the approval of the court. 12. At the conclusion of this litigation, copies of confidential documents will be retained by counsel in accordance with the Rules of the North Carolina State Bar. Following the required period of retention, counsel shall either destroy or return to opposing counsel all confidential documents or copies of confidential documents that have been produced subject to this Protective Order 4 13. Each party shall be responsible for its own mailing costs with regard to the return of the documents provided pursuant to this agreement, or costs of destruction. SO ORDERED. Signed: October 10, 2017 AGREED TO: FERGUSON CHAMBERS & SUMTER, P.A. /s/Geraldine Sumter Attorneys for Plaintiff THARRINGTON SMITH, L.L.P. /s/Deborah R. Stagner Attorneys for Defendants 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?