Dye v. SD Trust et al

Filing 14

ORDER that Plaintiff shall file her Response re 13 MOTIONS to Dismiss . Response due by 12/9/2016). Failure to file a timely Response may lead to the dismissal of Plaintiff's case without further notice. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 11/23/2016. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(chh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 3:16-cv-00681-MOC
SHARON-VICTORIA DYE,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
Vs.
SD TRUST
WELLS FARGO
FUNDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH
JOHN STUMPF,
Defendants.

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the court on federal defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (#13). From
a preliminary reading of the motion, defendants seek dismissal of this case as a matter of law. In
furtherance of the principles set forth in Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the
Court will advise the plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, of her obligation to respond to the Motion
as follows:
1.

You may file a brief written argument opposing the defendants’ Motions to Dismiss

on or before December 2, 2016.
2.

You are hereby advised that you have until December 9, 2016, in which to file your

response. If you fail to respond to the motion, the Court will proceed to decide the matter. A copy
of the response must be served on the opposite party and a certificate of service must be filed with
the Court showing that a copy has been sent to counsel for the opposite party.

-1-

ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file her Response to defendants’
Motions to Dismiss (#13) on or before December 9, 2016. Failure to file a timely Response may
lead to the dismissal of plaintiff’s case without further notice.

Signed: November 23, 2016

-2-