United States of America v. The Real Property located at and near 2548 Remus Road, Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 et al

Filing 9

ORDER granting 7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Ms. Sharon Cohen Levin is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Claimant Brookhill Land, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/21/16. (mga)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-685-MOC-DCK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. REAL PROPERTY located at and near 2548 Remus Road, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203 and more particularly described in deeds recorded at Book 14802, Pages 637-653 in the Register of Deeds for Mecklenburg County, North Carolina; and, THE LEASEHOLD held by BROOKHILL VILLAGE TWO, LLC, located at and near 2548 Remus Road, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203 and more particularly described in a deed recorded at Book 23703, Pages 602-605, and an assignment and assumption of ground lease recorded at Book 23703, Pages 606-610, in the Register of Deeds for Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice” (Document No. 7) filed by Martin L. Brackett, Jr., concerning Sharon Cohen Levin on November 21, 2016. Ms. Sharon Cohen Levin seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Claimant Brookhill Land, LLC. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, the “Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice” (Document No. 7) is GRANTED. Ms. Sharon Cohen Levin is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Claimant Brookhill Land, LLC. SO ORDERED. Signed: November 21, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?