Carawan v. Helms et al

Filing 19

ORDER denying 15 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 7/5/17. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:16-cv-693-FDW WILLIAM CARAWAN, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) ) FNU HELMS, Correctional Officer, ) Lanesboro CI, ) FNU MCLENDON, Correctional Officer, ) Lanesboro CI, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Motion for Reconsideration by pro se Plaintiff of this Court’s prior order denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal. (Doc. No. 15). The Court denies the motion for reconsideration for the reasons stated in the Court’s original order denying the motion. See (Doc. No. 14). Furthermore, to the extent that Plaintiff attached a motion to amend his Complaint to his motion for time to file his appeal, (Doc. Nos. 10-1, 10-2), the Court denies the motion to amend as futile, as the allegations in the proposed amended Complaint substantially restate the factual allegations made in Plaintiff’s original Complaint. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration, (Doc. No. 15), is DENIED. 1 Signed: July 5, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?