Sprint Communications Company, L.P. v. FairPoint Communications, Inc.
Filing
20
CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 8/9/17. (mga)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
COMPANY, L.P.
Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant
vs.
FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER
Civil No. 3:16-CV-00820-GCM
Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and it appearing that
discovery in the above-captioned action is likely to involve the disclosure of confidential
information, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
This Protective Order governs the designation, disclosure and use of confidential
information by Plaintiff and Defendant in the above-identified action. This Order shall govern until
modified or superseded by a further Order of the Court.
2.
The scope of this Protective Order shall be as follows:
(a)
As used in this Protective Order, the term “Discovery Materials” encompasses, but
is not limited to: any type of document or testimony; any taped, recorded, filmed,
electronic, written or typed matter, including the originals and all marked copies,
whether different from the originals by reason of any notation made on such copies
or otherwise; all deposition testimony; all interrogatories, document requests,
requests for admission, and subpoenas duces tecum, including all responses thereto;
and any physical objects or things or other information gained by inspection of any
tangible thing.
(b)
This Protective Order shall govern any and all Discovery Material produced before
or after entry of this Protective Order and includes, but is not limited to, Discovery
Material produced in response to any discovery conducted by Plaintiff or Defendant
in this above-captioned case. Nothing in this Protective Order prevents Plaintiff,
Defendant or a non-party from designating Discovery Material pursuant to this
Protective Order, including Discovery Material produced in other litigation.
(c)
Non-parties may invoke the protection of this Protective Order for documents and
deposition testimony and exhibits provided in connection with this litigation
1
including, but not limited to, documents and deposition testimony and exhibits
provided in response to subpoenas served on those third parties, and all confidential
information of non-parties as contained in such documents and depositions shall be
protected hereunder in the same manner as the confidential information of the
parties to this Protective Order as long as the nonparty agrees to be bound by this
Protective Order and those subsequent amendments to this Protective Order
concerning which the nonparty has received written notice and an opportunity to
seek a Protective Order.
3.
Plaintiff and Defendant, and any non-party from whom discovery is sought in
connection with this action, may designate as “Confidential” any Discovery Material that contains
“Confidential Information,” as more specifically defined in Paragraph 4 below. Plaintiff and
Defendant, and any non-party from whom discovery is sought in connection with this action, may
designate as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” any Discovery Material that contains
“Highly Confidential Information,” as more specifically defined in Paragraph 4 below. Except as
provided in Paragraphs 11-13, no designation shall be effective unless there is placed or affixed on
such material a “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” marking.
4.
No designation of confidentiality shall be made unless the designating party or nonparty from whom discovery is sought believes in good faith that the designated Discovery Material
constitutes a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information
entitled to protection under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (herein,
“Confidential Information”). Designation of Discovery Material as “Highly Confidential –
Attorneys’ Eyes Only” shall be limited to Discovery Material which the designating party in good
faith believes contains competitively sensitive information entitled to protection under Rule 26(c)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Discovery Material designated “Confidential” or “Highly
Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant to this Order shall refer to any so designated
document, testimony, or other Discovery Material and all copies thereof, and shall also refer to the
information contained in such material and any summaries thereof.
5.
Until or unless the Court rules otherwise, Discovery Material marked or otherwise
designated as “Confidential” and the information contained therein, shall be maintained in
confidence by the party to whom such material is produced and shall not be disclosed to any person
except:
(a)
Outside counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant in the above-identified litigation, such
counsel including their clerical, litigation support and paralegal employees who
agree to be bound by and comply with the terms of this Protective Order. As used
herein “outside counsel” shall mean attorneys for the respective firms who have
entered appearances on behalf of Plaintiff and Defendant in this above-captioned
litigation and attorneys or firms retained by counsel of record in connection with
this Action.
(b)
Current and former in-house employees of Plaintiff and Defendant to whom
disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation.
(c)
Consultants / experts for each of the Plaintiff and Defendant, said consultants /
2
experts specifically engaged by counsel or a party to assist in this litigation;
provided however, that
i)
ii)
(d)
the consultant / expert has signed an undertaking in the form of the attached
Exhibit A, which such undertaking shall be maintained by counsel for the
party specifically engaging the consultant / expert until the conclusion of
this litigation; and
the consultant / expert is not employed by any party to this litigation or any
competitor of any party to this litigation.
The Court and its officers, court stenographers and outside copy services whose
function requires them to have access to Discovery Material designated as
“Confidential” under this Protective Order.
(e) Personnel of third party vendors engaged by a party or by counsel for a party to assist
in (i) the coding, imaging or other management of documents produced in
discovery in this litigation; (ii) the translation of any foreign language document or
testimony; (iii) the preparation of demonstrative exhibits or other visual aids for
presentation at a hearing or trial; or (iv) jury research and analysis, provided that
such personnel of third party vendors shall not be employees of a party and provided
such personnel of third party vendors execute the undertaking attached as Exhibit A
before getting access to Discovery Material designated as “Confidential.”
(f)
Mediators/mediator firms specifically retained to mediate this dispute.
(g)
Any witness at a deposition who was an author or recipient of the document.
(h)
Billing agents (regardless of whether designated as an expert or not) and the
stenographic and clerical employees or agents of the billing agents, whose duties
and responsibilities require access to Confidential Information.
6.
Until or unless the Court rules otherwise, Discovery Material marked or otherwise
designated as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” and the information contained therein,
shall be maintained in confidence by the party to whom such material is produced and shall not be
disclosed to any person except:
(a)
Outside counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant in the above-identified litigation, such
counsel including their clerical, litigation support and paralegal employees who
agree to be bound by and comply with the terms of this Protective Order. As used
herein “outside counsel” shall mean attorneys for the respective firms who have
entered appearances on behalf of Plaintiff and Defendant in this above-captioned
litigation and attorneys or firms retained by counsel of record in connection with
this Action.
(b)
Consultants / experts for each of the Plaintiff and Defendant, said consultants /
experts specifically engaged by counsel or a party to assist in this litigation;
provided however, that
3
a. the consultant / expert has signed an undertaking in the form of the attached Exhibit
A, which such undertaking shall be maintained by counsel for the party specifically
engaging the consultant / expert until the conclusion of this litigation; and
b. the consultant / expert is not employed by any party to this litigation or any
competitor of any party to this litigation.
(c)
The Court and its officers, court stenographers and outside copy services whose
function requires them to have access to Discovery Material designated as
“Confidential” under this Protective Order.
(d) Personnel of third party vendors engaged by a party or by counsel for a party to assist
in (i) the coding, imaging or other management of documents produced in
discovery in this litigation; (ii) the translation of any foreign language document or
testimony; (iii) the preparation of demonstrative exhibits or other visual aids for
presentation at a hearing or trial; or (iv) jury research and analysis, provided that
such personnel of third party vendors shall not be employees of a party and provided
such personnel of third party vendors execute the undertaking attached as Exhibit A
before getting access to Discovery Material designated as “Confidential.”
(e)
Mediators/mediator firms specifically retained to mediate this dispute.
(f)
Any witness at a deposition who was an author or recipient of the document.
7.
Notwithstanding Paragraph 5 above, Confidential Discovery Material may be
shown to any person who is not a former or current employee of any party to this litigation who a
party’s counsel in good faith believes is or will be a witness or deponent in this Action, provided
that such witness has signed an undertaking in the form attached as Exhibit A hereto and that a
person identified solely in this subparagraph shall not be permitted to retain copies of Confidential
Discovery Material.
8.
In the event a receiving party desires for a non-witness who does not fall within the
categories contained in Paragraph 5 above to review “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential –
Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information produced by the disclosing party, then the receiving party shall
so notify the disclosing party and give the disclosing party reasonable time to object. If the
disclosing party objects to the receiving party’s desired disclosure of the disclosing party’s
“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information to the non-witness,
then the receiving party must obtain permission from the Court before disclosing the disclosing
party’s “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information to the nonwitness.
9.
Prior to any disclosure of “Confidential” information pursuant to Paragraphs 5-6
above, each recipient of such “Confidential” information shall execute the Confidentiality
Agreement annexed hereto as Exhibit A. These signed confidentiality undertakings shall be
maintained by outside counsel for the receiving party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, outside
counsel, former and current employees of either party, and authors/recipients of the document shall
not be required to execute the Confidentiality Agreement prior to receipt of Confidential
4
information.
10.
In the event the producing party elects to produce original documents or other
material for inspection, no markings need be made by the producing party in advance of the
inspection. During the inspection, all such documents or other material shall be considered as
marked “Confidential”and “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” shall be segregated.
After selection by the inspecting party of specified documents or material for copying, the
producing party shall make the appropriate copies, and the appropriate confidentiality designations
shall be placed on the specified documents or materials prior to providing the copies to the
inspecting party.
11.
Testimony given at a deposition or hearing and the resulting transcript may be
designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” by an appropriate
statement at the time of the giving of such testimony or thereafter by notifying the other party to
this Protective Order in writing of the portions of such testimony to be so designated within thirty
(30) days from the date of the deposition. Unless the parties otherwise agree, the entire transcript
of the deposition shall be deemed designated as “Confidential” for thirty (30) days from the date
of the deposition. Any transcript or testimony or portions thereof so designated will thereafter be
handled and marked in accordance with the provisions of this Protective Order. Subject to the
provisions of this Protective Order, Plaintiff and Defendant agree that certain deposition testimony
may be transmitted via a live webcast or other technology to persons authorized to review such
testimony if adequate procedures are utilized, which procedures have been agreed upon by the
parties and the applicable witnesses. Plaintiff and Defendant further agree that no one may attend
or review the transcripts of the portions of any depositions at which “Confidential” or “Highly
Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information is shown or discussed, other than those persons
authorized to have access to “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
information as described above.
12.
Discovery Material produced without the designation of “Confidential” or “Highly
Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” may be so designated subsequent to production or testimony
when the producing party failed to make such designation at the time of production or during the
testimony through inadvertence or error and the designation is corrected within a reasonable
amount of time. If Discovery Material is designated subsequent to production or testimony, the
receiving party promptly shall collect any copies that have been provided to individuals other than
those authorized in Paragraphs 5 and 6 of this Order. Any inadvertent production of documents
without the designation as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” shall
not be deemed a waiver in whole or in part of that party’s claim of confidentiality, either as to the
specific information disclosed or as to any other information relating thereto or on the same or
related subject matter.
13.
Any party that mistakenly produces materials protected by the attorney/client
privilege, work product doctrine or other privilege, doctrine or right may obtain the return of those
materials by promptly notifying the recipient(s) of the produced documents. In the event there is
no dispute as to the claim of privilege, the recipient shall then immediately cease all use of the
privileged material and gather and return all copies of the privileged material to the producing
party. In the event there is a dispute as to the claim of privilege, the receiving party must promptly
notify the producing party and must sequester the privileged material and must not use or disclose
5
that material. The parties agree to promptly meet and confer concerning the dispute as to the claim
of privilege. If the parties are unable to resolve the disagreement, the receiving party shall present
the information to the court under seal within 10 days for a determination of the privilege. Any
inadvertent production of such privileged documents shall not be deemed a waiver in whole or in
part of that party’s claim of privilege, either as to the specific information disclosed or as to any
other information relating thereto or on the same or related subject matter.
14.
No party shall be obligated to challenge the propriety of a confidentiality
designation at the time made, and a failure to do so shall not constitute an admission by the
receiving party that the information is “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
Only” or preclude a subsequent challenge to such designation. A party that challenges a
designation by another party may move the Court to order de-designation of any material only after
participating in an in-person or telephonic meet and confer in which the parties shall seek in good
faith to resolve their dispute. If a motion is filed, the moving party shall bear the burden of
establishing the need for the lower designation or de- designation. The disputed material shall
remain “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” until the Court rules on
such motion or the parties reach agreement on the designation.
15.
All Discovery Material exchanged between Plaintiff and Defendant in this action,
whether designated under provisions of this Protective Order or not, shall be used by the receiving
party solely for the prosecution or defense of the claims in the above-styled action.
16.
If Confidential Information of the other party or a nonparty in the possession,
custody, or control of any party is sought by subpoena, request for production of documents,
interrogatories, or any other form of discovery request or compulsory process, including any form
of discovery request or compulsory process of any court, administrative or legislative body, or any
other person or tribunal purporting to have opportunity to seek such information by compulsory
process or discovery request, including private parties, counsel for the party to whom the process
or discovery request is directed must give written notice to the other party or nonparty, prior to the
disclosure of the other party or nonparty’s information, of the other party or nonparty’s right to
submit any objections in writing to this Court, or another court with jurisdiction, within three (3)
days of the receipt of such notice. If the other party or nonparty submits such written objections to
the production of said Confidential Information within fourteen (14) days of receipt of such written
notice, counsel for the party receiving the request shall not disclose such Confidential Information
until the objection(s) have been resolved. If any such documents are ultimately produced, they may
be designated as “Confidential” under this Protective Order.
17.
Within sixty (60) days after the conclusion of this case, including any appeals and
all proceedings resulting therefrom, all “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
Only” information designated and produced hereunder, and all copies thereof, shall be returned to
the producing party, or, at the option of the producing party, opposing counsel shall certify in
writing that such material has been destroyed. Counsel for any party or nonparty receiving
“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information shall provide written
certification of compliance with this provision to counsel for the producing party within ninety
(90) days after the conclusion of the above-captioned action.
18.
No “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material shall
6
be filed in the public record of this action. Any document or thing containing or embodying
“Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material that is to be filed in this
proceeding shall be filed under seal as permitted by the Court or pursuant to the instructions of the
Court for filing such material. Nothing in this provision shall prevent an additional copy from
being sent to chambers as a courtesy copy as long as it is sent in a sealed envelope indicating that
it contains “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material. Such
documents shall be opened and reviewed only by authorized Court personnel or upon request, by
counsel of record, after written notice to opposing counsel.
19.
With respect to testimony elicited during hearings and other court proceedings,
whenever outside counsel for any party deems that any question or line of questioning calls for the
disclosure of “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information,
outside counsel may designate on the record prior to such disclosure that the disclosure is
“Confidential.” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” Any presentation of
“Confidential” information to this Court at or prior to trial shall be made in the presence of only
the presiding officer and other court personnel, an authorized court reporter, outside counsel for
the parties to this Protective Order, and to such individuals duly qualified under Paragraphs 5-7
herein. Prior to any presentation of “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
Only” material, the presiding officer or the Clerk of this Court shall advise all court personnel and
court reporters of the confidential nature of the “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential –
Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information and of the duty to maintain the confidentiality of such
information.
20.
The restrictions set forth in any of the preceding paragraphs, including Paragraphs
4-7, shall not apply to information or material that:
(a)
was, is, or becomes public in a manner other than by violation of this Protective
Order or another Protective Order;
(b)
is acquired by the nondesignating party from a third party having the right to
disclose such information or material; or
(c)
was lawfully possessed by the nondisclosing party.
21.
This Protective Order is without prejudice to either party’s right to oppose
production of documents on any ground other than confidentiality or seeking to amend this
Protective Order at a later time.
22.
This Protective Order shall remain in full force and effect after the termination of
this litigation, or until cancelled or otherwise modified by Order of this Court.
23.
The ultimate disposition of protected materials shall be subject to a final order
of the Court upon completion of the litigation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Signed: August 9, 2017
/s/ Amy E. Richardson
Amy E. Richardson (N.C. Bar No. 28768)
Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP
2009 Fairview Road # 6220
Raleigh, NC 27628
Telephone: (919) 429-7386
arichardson@hwglaw.com
/s/ Susan R. Podolsky
Susan R. Podolsky (pro hac vice)
Law Offices of Susan R. Podolsky
1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
Telephone: (571) 366-1702
spodolsky@podolskylaw.com
Steven A. Fredley (pro hac vice)
Deepika Ravi (pro hac vice)
Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP
1919 M Street, N.W., Suite 800 Washington,
D.C. 20036
Telephone: (202) 730-1300
sfredley@hwglaw.com
dravi@hwglaw.com
Susan L. Sowell
Sr. Vice President, Deputy General Counsel
and Head of Compliance
FairPoint Communications, Inc.
521 East Morehead Street, Suite 500
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone: (704) 227-3647
ssowell@fairpoint.com
Counsel for Sprint Communications
Company, L.P.
Counsel for Defendant FairPoint
Communications, Inc.
8
EXHIBIT A
STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY
My
present
address
is
.
My
present
employer
is
, and the address of my present employer is
.
My
present
occupation
is
.
By signing this document, I hereby certify that I have read the Protective Order entered by
the Court on
, 2017. I understand the terms of the Order and agree to
abide by its contents.
Name
Date
Name
Date
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?