Cox et al v. National Association for Stock Car Racing, Inc. et al

Filing 39

ORDER granting 37 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Christopher Marquardt is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Defendant National Association for Stock Car Racing, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 2/9/17. (mga)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-843-FDW-DCK TERRANCE ALTON COX III, and DIVERSITY MOTORSPORTS RACING, LLC, ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR STOCK ) CAR RACING, INC., BK RACING, INC., ) CHIP GANASSI RACING, CIRCLE ) SPORT LLC, FRONT ROW ) MOTORSPORTS, INC., FURNITURE ) ROW RACING, GERMAIN RACING, LLC, ) GO FAS RACING, HENDRICK ) MOTORSPORTS, HSJR PERFORMANCE ) II, LLC, JOE GIBBS RACING, INC., JTG ) RACING, INC., PENSKE RACING ) SOUTH, INC., RCR RACE OPERATIONS, ) LLC, ROUSH FENWAY RACING, LLC, ) RPAC RACING, LLC, STEWART HASS ) RACING, LLC, and TOMMY BALDWIN ) RACING, LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice of Christopher C. Marquardt” (Document No. 37) filed by Brian D. Boone, concerning Christopher C. Marquardt on February 9, 2017. Mr. Christopher C. Marquardt seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant National Association for Stock Car Racing, Inc. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice” of Christopher C. Marouardt” (Document No. 37) is GRANTED. Mr. Christopher C. Marquardt is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Defendant National Association for Stock Car Racing, Inc. SO ORDERED. Signed: February 9, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?