Shine v. USA

Filing 2

ORDER re 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255). Petitioner shall have twenty (20) days from entry of this Order in which to resubmit the petition signed under penalty of perjury. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 1/24/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:17-cv-8-MOC (3:14-cr-182-MOC-1) ANTONIO L. SHINE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion under 28, United States Code, Section 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody, (Doc. No. 1). I. Initial Screening The Court has conducted an initial screening of the petition under the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, Rule 4(b) 28 U.S.C.A. foll. § 2255, and finds: (1) the petition has not been signed under penalty of perjury, Rule 2(b)(5), 28 U.S.C.A. foll. § 2255; (2) Petitioner has provided indicia that the petition was timely filed, see § 2255(f); and (3) Petitioner has asserted a colorable claim for relief cognizable under § 2255(a). Petitioner shall have twenty (20) days in which to resubmit the petition signed under penalty of perjury. If Petitioner fails to do so, the petition will be subject to dismissal without further notice. 1 Upon receipt of the petition with Petitioner’s signature under penalty of perjury, the Court will direct the United States to respond. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Petitioner shall have twenty (20) days from entry of this Order in which to resubmit the petition signed under penalty of perjury. If Petitioner fails to do so, the petition will be subject to dismissal without further notice. Signed: January 24, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?