Tilson v. Every Day is a Holiday, Inc. et al
Filing
24
ORDER re 23 MOTION for clarification. Parties shall follow instructions as set forth in this Order. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/19/2017. (chh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
Civil Action No.: 3:17-cv-00018-GCM
JANIE TILSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
EVERY DAY IS A HOLIDAY, INC. d/b/a
CENTURION STONE OF THE
CAROLINAS & GARY SPANGLER,
Defendants.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Petition for Confirmation of Title VII
Retaliation Fee Award submitted by Defendants Todd Grear and Gary Spangler (Doc. No. 23).
42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k) allows the Court in a Title VII action to, in its discretion, award
the prevailing party a reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the costs. Plaintiff filed a complaint
against Grear, Spangler, and Every Day is a Holiday, Inc. Relevant to this Petition is Count III
of the Complaint, a Title VII retaliation claim filed against all three Defendants.
In this Court’s August 1, 2017 Order on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, the Court found
that the Title VII retaliation claim was brought without any foundation with respect to
Defendants Grear and Spangler. The Court accordingly dismissed that claim as to Grear and
Spangler and held that Grear and Spangler are entitled to a reasonable attorney’s fee.
Grear and Spangler request payment of $4,237.60. However, because the Motion to
Dismiss was filed on behalf of all three Defendants and included research and briefing on four
other causes of action alleged by Tilson (several of which contained more in-depth research and
analysis than the Title VII retaliation claim), the Court finds that the amount requested is
excessive. Instead, the Court will award half of the amount requested, reducing it to $2,118.80.
Accordingly, the Petition is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to pay
Defendants Grear and Spangler, collectively, $2,118.80.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: December 19, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?