Maddux v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al

Filing 32

ORDER Affirming 31 Memorandum and Recommendations. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 1/4/2018. (jaw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:17cv59-GCM-DCK MICHAEL MADDUX, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT ) INSURANCE COMPANY, and ) WAL-MART STORES, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) ORDER This matter is before the Court upon the Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate David C. Keesler, filed November 3, 2017. The parties were advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, written objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service of the same. No objections have been filed. After an independent and thorough review of the magistrate’s memorandum, the court concludes that there is no clear error on the face of the record and the recommendation to deny Wal-Mart Stores Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss is affirmed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommendation is hereby AFFIRMED. Signed: January 4, 2018

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?