Maddux v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
Filing
32
ORDER Affirming 31 Memorandum and Recommendations. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 1/4/2018. (jaw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:17cv59-GCM-DCK
MICHAEL MADDUX,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT
)
INSURANCE COMPANY, and
)
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon the Memorandum and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate David C. Keesler, filed November 3,
2017. The parties were advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Rule
72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, written objections to the Memorandum
and Recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service of the same. No
objections have been filed.
After an independent and thorough review of the magistrate’s memorandum,
the court concludes that there is no clear error on the face of the record and the
recommendation to deny Wal-Mart Stores Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss is affirmed.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Memorandum and
Recommendation is hereby AFFIRMED.
Signed: January 4, 2018
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?