Cole et al v. James B. Nutter & Company et al

Filing 7

ORDER denying 5 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 5/15/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-00078-GCM ELIZABETH COLE, VINCENT LINEBERGER, Appellant, v. JAMES B. NUTTER & COMPANY, SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE SERVICES INC, Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Appellants’ Motion for Reconsideration. The Appellants filed their Motion to Appeal on February 21, 2017, following the Bankruptcy Court’s Order dismissing the appellants’ complaint on January 5, 2017 and the Bankruptcy Court’s Order confirming its authority to enter final orders and granting in part and denying part appellants’ motion for additional findings of fact and conclusions of law on Bankruptcy Court’s authority to enter a final judgment on February 6, 2017. On March 8, 2017 the bankruptcy court notified the Court that Appellants have failed to pay the required $298 filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1930. On February 21, 2017 the Appellants were notified in writing and given ten business days to pay the requisite filing fee. On March 14, 2017, this Court entered an Order dismissing this appeal because no fee was tendered. It appears that later that day the Appellants paid the requisite fee to the clerk of the bankruptcy court. The Appellants were given notice in writing of their failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1930 by the clerk of the bankruptcy court and did not do so until this Court entered an Order dismissing the case 21 days after that written notification. The Appellant has failed to present the court with any compelling reason for its delay in paying the requisite filing fee. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellants’ Motion for Reconsideration is hereby DENIED. Signed: May 15, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?