Hunt v. Wall et al

Filing 49

AMENDED ORDER re 47 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct, Order on Motion to Seal. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/13/2018. (brl)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:17-cv-129-FDW TAVIEOLIS HUNT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) JEFFREY WALL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) AMENDED ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Case Caption, (Doc. No. 41), and Motion to File Under Seal, (Doc. No. 43). Plaintiff filed a Stipulation of Dismissal, signed by all the parties who have appeared, voluntarily dismissing from this action Defendant Lawrence, whom Plaintiff was never able to serve, and Officers John Doe 2 and 3, whom Plaintiff was never able to identify and serve. (Doc. No. 40); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(l)(A)(ii). The Motion to Amend the Case Caption to remove the Defendants Lawrence and Officers John Doe 2 and 3, to which Defendants Wall, Peguese, and Parsons have consented, will be granted to the extent that the action will be terminated as to these parties. Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend or Correct the Motion for Protective Order that was subsequently withdrawn. (Doc. Nos. 42, 45). The Memorandum in Support of the Motion, (Doc. No. 44), contains sensitive information and therefore the Motion to Seal will be granted even though the Motion to Amend is now moot. IT IS ORDERED that (1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Case Caption, (Doc. No. 41), is GRANTED to the 1 extent that the action will be terminated as to Defendants Lawrence and Officers John Doe 2 and 3. (2) Plaintiff’s Motion to File Under Seal, (Doc. No. 43), is GRANTED. (3) The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate Defendants Lawrence and Officer Jon Doe 2 and 3. Signed: October 31, 2018 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?